CaseDelta vs ChatGPT
You have tried ChatGPT. It gave you a confident answer about the law. It has no idea who your client is, what is in their file, or what you decided last week. That gap is the whole point.
CaseDelta is an AI associate built for law firms that works a firm's real cases across its tools, while ChatGPT is a general-purpose assistant with no knowledge of a firm's matters, systems, or files. The difference is context: ChatGPT answers the question you type, and Delta answers it about your actual client, grounded in the real file.
CaseDelta versus ChatGPT, in a table.
ChatGPT knows the law in general. Delta knows your case in particular, and proves every answer against the real file.
Where they diverge.
A smart answer, or a smart answer about your real client
A general AI will answer the question you ask, confidently, even when your premise is wrong, because it has never seen the file. Delta answers as the facts actually are, because it has the case. In law, where a wrong premise can sink a matter, that difference is not a nicety. It is the entire value. The killer line: context makes answers correct even when the human is wrong.
Built for Rule 1.6, not against it
Pasting client details into ChatGPT's free or Plus tier raises a real confidentiality problem: those inputs may be used to improve the model unless you opt out, and there is no matter-level audit trail to show what you shared. Delta never uses your data to train AI, isolates each firm's data, and logs every action so you can demonstrate reasonable efforts under ABA Rule 1.6.
It drives your tools; ChatGPT waits for you to paste
With ChatGPT, you are the integration: you copy text out of Clio or a PDF, paste it in, copy the answer back. Delta drives the tools directly. It reads the discovery, builds the chronology, drafts the demand, and updates the case file, without you shuttling text between windows.
When ChatGPT is the right tool
For general drafting, brainstorming, and learning that involves no client confidential information, ChatGPT is a powerful, inexpensive assistant. The line is client data: the moment a real matter is involved, you want a tool that knows the case, cites the real file, never trains on your data, and keeps an audit trail.
Common questions
Is it safe to use ChatGPT with client information?
Using ChatGPT's free or Plus tier with client data is risky: inputs may be used to improve the model unless you opt out, and there is no matter-level audit trail. CaseDelta never uses your data to train AI, isolates each firm's data, and logs every action for ABA Rule 1.6.
Why can't I just paste my case into ChatGPT?
You can, but ChatGPT only knows what you paste, can fabricate citations with no file to check against, and keeps no audit trail. Delta works your real matter across your tools, cites primary sources from the actual file, and answers grounded in your case rather than generic law.
Does CaseDelta use the same AI as ChatGPT?
CaseDelta uses enterprise AI under agreements that do not train on your data, applied to your real cases inside your tools, with citations and an audit trail. The difference is not a chatbot; it is an associate that knows your firm's matters.
See Delta inside your firm's stack.
A fifteen-minute live demo on a sandbox of your firm's tools, running a real workflow end to end.