CaseDelta vs Supio
We will not pretend our chronologies are more accurate than Supio's. Theirs are good, and human-reviewed. The difference is shape, speed without a queue, and scope: Delta runs your whole operation, not just the document.
CaseDelta is an AI associate that drives a firm's existing tools and works the whole case, while Supio is a plaintiff-focused document-intelligence platform that turns medical records into chronologies, demands, and case ledgers. Supio's output is genuinely strong and human-reviewed; the difference is that Supio is a product you feed and CaseDelta is an associate that operates across your stack.
CaseDelta versus Supio, in a table.
Supio produces excellent documents on a review queue. Delta does the whole job across your tools, in minutes, at a published price.
Where they diverge.
Accuracy is table stakes, so we compete on shape
Supio is well capitalized, plaintiff-native, and backed by Thomson Reuters, and it powered analysis behind a $495M verdict. Its chronologies are clean and source-pinned. We are not going to win a chronology-accuracy bake-off, and we will not claim to. The difference is that Supio is a product you feed your files to, and Delta is an associate that drives the tools you already run and does the work around the document too.
No review queue, and a price you can see
Supio's human-expert review is a real trust anchor, and it is also a speed and cost ceiling: you wait on a queue and you negotiate a quote. Delta delivers cited chronologies in minutes with no review queue, and CaseDelta is $349 per user, per month. flat, published, self-serve. For a 5 to 50 attorney firm, transparent and self-serve beats an enterprise sales motion.
The whole job, not just the document
Supio hands back outputs. Delta keeps going: it drafts the demand, emails the adjuster, updates the case file, calculates damages, and logs the time across Clio, Filevine, your email, and billing. It is one associate doing the operation, not one more system to feed.
When Supio is the better fit
If you are a larger plaintiff or mass-tort firm whose primary need is best-in-class, human-reviewed medical chronologies and case ledgers, and you value the Thomson Reuters relationship and the enterprise success team, Supio is an excellent, proven choice. CaseDelta is the better fit when you want an operational associate across your whole stack at a transparent, self-serve price.
Common questions
Are CaseDelta's chronologies as accurate as Supio's?
Supio's chronologies are genuinely strong and human-reviewed, and we treat chronology accuracy as table stakes rather than a selling point. Delta produces cited, primary-source chronologies over large sets in minutes. We compete on shape, speed without a queue, and breadth, not on an accuracy claim.
Does Supio integrate with my CMS?
Yes. Supio markets a two-way CMS integration, which is one of its stronger areas, so we do not knock Supio on integration. The difference is that Delta is the operational associate that runs the work across those systems, where Supio is the document product you feed.
What does Supio cost compared to CaseDelta?
Supio is quote-gated with no public pricing. CaseDelta is a flat $349 per user, per month, published and self-serve. The contrast is transparency and predictability, not a confirmed dollar gap.
See Delta inside your firm's stack.
A fifteen-minute live demo on a sandbox of your firm's tools, running a real workflow end to end.